- 💰 Run $3,000 Agency Audits for Free — Open-Source GEO Tool + Money-Making Playbook

SRZ
Sun, 29 Mar 2026 01:29:53 +0000

One Free Tool Just Replaced Your $12K/Month SEO Agency — And Nobody’s Talking About the Best Part

Open-source AI audit that tells you exactly why ChatGPT, Gemini, and Perplexity ignore your website — and how to fix it in a weekend.

$2,000 to $12,000 a month. That’s what GEO agencies charge to do what this tool does for free. One command. Five AI agents run at the same time. A full report lands in your lap — scores, charts, action items, everything.

The catch? There’s no catch. MIT license. 100% open source. You own the output.

The only cost is a $20/month Claude Pro subscription — because the tool runs inside Claude Code. That’s the real price tag. Not $0. Not $12K. Twenty bucks.

🗺️ What This Tool Actually Does — Plain English, No Buzzwords (click for more details) ⚡ How to Set It Up — 3 Steps, 5 Minutes (click for more details) 📊 The Numbers That Make This Real — Why GEO Matters Right Now (click for more details) 🕳️ What the Tool Doesn't Tell You — The 3 Gaps Nobody Mentions (click for more details) 💰 5 Ways to Actually Make Money With This — Starting This Weekend (click for more details) 🔍 How GEO-SEO Claude Compares — Honest Look at Alternatives (click for more details) ⚠️ Fact-Check — What the Viral Post Gets Wrong (click for more details) 🧠 The Bigger Picture — What Changed in January 2026 (click for more details)

Quick Hits

Want | Do
Run your first audit | → claude then /geo audit yoursite.com
See your AI traffic | → GA4 custom channel group with the regex above
Make money this weekend | → Run audits on 5 local businesses, email them the PDF
Highest-chance citation | → Record a YouTube video answering the exact question your customers ask AI
Cover what the tool misses | → Check “People Also Ask” for your keywords, write content for each sub-question

Repo: GEO-SEO Claude on GitHub — MIT License, open source

The SEO agencies charging $12K/month for this workflow just felt a chill. Good.

Read full topic